Technical Professionals: Evaluate Technical Presentation Decks
This is the employer's own posting, not a copy on a job board.
What we know
Is it still open?
Confirmed still open
Last checked 1d ago — checked against the employer's own applicant tracking system, which is the company answering directly.
We re-read the employer's own applicant tracking system and the posting was still there. That is the company answering directly.
How old is it?
Posted 8d ago
The date the source published, not the day we noticed it (2026-10-24). Last seen at its source 2h ago.
We have tracked this listing since 24 Oct 2026 (8 days). The employer's own board has carried it every time we have read it, most recently 2 hours ago.
Is it remote?
Marked remote on the employer's board
Their board carries a remote setting on this posting — a field they filled in, not wording we read. The location field names somewhere specific, which is usually where the team or the entity sits.
Who may apply?
United States
The description states no restriction of its own. This is the source's own tag.
Pay
$90/hr
Read out of the job description by us, not from a structured field. Shown in the posting's own currency and period; we never convert.
Carried by 1 source
-
Ashby employer's own board first seen 8d ago · last seen 2h ago
The listing
What We're Researching
We are running a paid study to determine what constitutes a highly effective technical presentation. Our goal is to train our models to understand how professionals structure and communicate complex technical information. This work feeds directly into improving automated evaluations of design reviews, roadmaps, and postmortems.
How It Works
You will review various technical slide decks relevant to your field on a flexible, remote schedule. During your tasks, you will examine materials like design reviews, experiment readouts, and model launches. After reviewing the materials, you will rank them based on clarity, structure, and overall effectiveness. This asynchronous work requires you to provide thoughtful feedback on why certain presentations succeed where others fail.
Who This Is For
We are looking for experienced technical professionals who regularly create or review engineering presentations. We welcome software engineers, engineering managers, product managers, and data scientists. Candidates should be highly familiar with technical documents like postmortems, roadmaps, and architecture reviews.
What You'll Do
Review technical slide decks from your specific domain
Rank presentations based on clarity, structure, and technical communication
Evaluate design reviews, roadmaps, and experiment readouts
Provide clear feedback on what makes a specific presentation effective
Who Should Apply
Professional experience in a technical or engineering role
Familiarity with creating or reviewing technical presentations
Comfortable evaluating design reviews, postmortems, or roadmaps
Ability to articulate clear feedback on technical communication
Compensation
$90 per hour
Ready to participate?
About Terac
Terac is building the world's largest pool of vetted human experts for AI. Researchers, AI labs, and product teams use Terac to recruit, screen, and pay study participants across industries, languages, and skill sets.
Learn more at terac.com or on YouTube at @jointerac.